Punitive Damages - Punitive Damage and Reverse Discrimination, Racial Discrimination in New York

Portrait of a Victim

Nicholas Biondi:

As a volunteer on a committee at his NYC co-op, Nick Biondi was victimized by circumstances and a system that changed his life forever.

His is the story of a successful business man, family man, and community leader who nearly lost it all...just for being a "good neighbor."

WHY DID JUDGE CARTER
CONCEAL BROOME'S MEMORANDUM FROM BIONDI'S JURY?

Gregory Broome

Simone Demou owned a co-op apartment in

New York City and she wanted to rent to Gregory and Shannon Broome. When she told Gregory Broome that he and Shannon would have to fill out a rental application and be interviewed by a tenants committee of two persons, Greg Broome went ballistic. He fired off a memorandum dated May 31, 1995 to Simone stating, “We do not intend to go through an interview. We have neither the time nor the patience to deal with the egomaniacs that put together these forms.” He complained that it was going to be “much more of a hassle than we believed” to get the apartment. The note concluded “I am confident that, if the Board stays out of our way, we’ll have an excellent relationship over the next two years.”

When the contents of this memo were revealed to Nick Biondi by Simone Demou, Nick Biondi described Mr. Broome as “arrogant.”

Judge Robert L. Carter

As reported on the front page of the New York Times on May 14, 1997, Judge Robert L. Carter, the presiding judge at Nick’s trial, described the word “arrogant” as “a code name for racial discrimination” and suggested that the Broome’s had made a case that they had been victims of discrimination, since “arrogant,” the judge said was itself a “a code name for racial discrimination.”

Click for Full Story

Can federal judge Robert L. Carter be reasonably condemned as a racist, anti-white, bigot because of his actions, statements and decisions in the Broome versus Biondi case?

Judge Robert L. Carter would not let the jury see the memorandum that Gregory Broome sent to Simone Demue. His reason: He felt that it would prejudice the jury against Mr. Broome.

Under no possible interpretation can Carter's decision to withhold Broome's memorandum from Biondi's jury be considered anything but a willful, deliberate, biased and prejudicial act against Biondi by Judge Carter.

The inescapable conclusion.....withholding Broome's memorandum from the jury would prejudice the jury against Mr. Biondi. Exactly the biased result that Judge Carter desired!!